A year after OAP drove onto high-speed railway line, the wait for new signs goes on

A year after OAP drove onto high-speed railway line, the wait for new signs goes on A year after OAP drove onto high-speed railway line, the wait for new signs goes on

IT was a disastrous error that could have led to tragedy.

An 85-year-old motorist was half-way across a level crossing when she suddenly veered off the road and along a high-speed railway line, narrowly missing the live rail and halting trains.

But highway chiefs have taken a year to devise a scheme aimed at preventing anything similar happening again.

Campaigners have condemned the delays surrounding the project, which includes new road signs either side of the barrier-controlled crossing at Brockenhurst station.

Denis Fryer, of the South Hampshire Rail Users’ Group, said: “It’s very poor.

“The risks attached to any incident involving an electrified rail are huge.

“The county council seems to have taken an awfully long time to address something that should have been dealt with pretty quickly.”

The incident happened a year ago today. A New Milton pensioner was giving her 20-year-old grandson a lift when she mistook the line for the entrance to the station car park.

Instead of stopping or reversing, she drove 80 yards up the track and ended up on a set of points near the end of platform two.

She and her grandson escaped unhurt after rail employees quickly switched off the power.

Network Rail said trains were in no danger because the crossing barriers were up, which meant all the signals in the area were on red.

The gran was reported for careless driving, but British Transport Police dropped the case after she handed in her licence.

The proposed new directional signs aim to prevent anyone else making the same error.

Parish council chairman Russell Horne welcomed the scheme, but called for the inclusion of a “non-standard” sign highlighting the position of the track.

“At the moment there’s nothing to indicate that there’s a railway there,” he said.

Cllr Horne defended the time taken to implement the measures.

He said: “It’s always a lot better when things are done more speedily, but the county council has had to carry out a proper process of consultation and consideration.”

A Network Rail spokesman said: “What happened at Brockenhurst was incredibly unusual. It’s not the sort of thing we see every day.”

South West Trains declined to comment.

What the county council says

Councillor Mel Kendal, deputy leader and executive member for environment and transport, said: “Immediately following the incident the county council, as the highway authority, carried out a preliminary assessment and concluded that signage was not a significant causal factor in this case.

“Because the incident took place on the railway, Network Rail undertook a detailed review and our highways engineers were happy to provide their input.

“Once the review was largely complete, our initial view was there was nothing to change our preliminary conclusion about signage but we did think it was appropriate to refresh the signing in the area. Some early proposals were prepared and have been discussed with the parish council.

“Following comments received from them, we are currently in discussion with the Department for Transport to see if we are able to accommodate a request for signs which ordinarily would not be compliant with the Department’s standards and regulations.”

Comments(15)

P Barker says...
4:02pm Mon 28 Jan 13

One confused person who wasnt safe on the road, so are signs really needed ?.

BIGTONE says...
4:05pm Mon 28 Jan 13

The sign man cometh.

ben111 says...
4:38pm Mon 28 Jan 13

Its insane how we have to save people from them selves

mookie44 says...
4:40pm Mon 28 Jan 13

A one word sign will do

"THINK"

Would save on costs as well.

muscliffman says...
5:18pm Mon 28 Jan 13

To be fair anyone driving a vehicle should not need a sign to instruct them NOT to drive a fair distance along an electrifield (or any) railway line.

"council chairman Russell Horne welcomed the scheme, but called for the inclusion of a “non-standard” sign highlighting the position of the track.

“At the moment there’s nothing to indicate that there’s a railway there,” he said."

Well apart from the railway tracks, sleepers, electric conductor rail, ballast, regular trains and a complete lack of tarmac that is. Where do these Councillors come from?

I think withdrawing this poor confused motorist's driving licence was probably the only action that was needed - did that happen though?

PokesdownMark says...
5:43pm Mon 28 Jan 13

What we need are some safe traps for drivers like this. Places that look just a tiny little bit like entrances to car parks but are filled with deep gravel and trigger an alarm in nearby police cars. Jobs a good 'un. I'm semi serious.

nobbjockie says...
6:36pm Mon 28 Jan 13

I'm not be funny but WTF!!!

retry69 says...
6:52pm Mon 28 Jan 13

Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!

nobbjockie says...
7:08pm Mon 28 Jan 13

nobbjockie wrote:
I'm not be funny but WTF!!!
Can you imagine what could have happened if there had been a Nissan Micra coming up from Christchurch!

Trifid says...
7:59pm Mon 28 Jan 13

retry69 wrote:
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.

PokesdownMark says...
8:05pm Mon 28 Jan 13

Retest everyone every 10 years or when/if they rack up 9 points. Simples.

retry69 says...
9:40pm Mon 28 Jan 13

Trifid wrote:
retry69 wrote:
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.
Well obviously that would come but there needs to be a starting point and starting at the 50s and over would greatly reduce the number of cars on the roads because the majority would fail, therefore reduced incidents and more importantly near misses, end result safer roads for all.

Old Harry says...
11:44pm Mon 28 Jan 13

retry69 wrote:
Trifid wrote:
retry69 wrote:
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.
Well obviously that would come but there needs to be a starting point and starting at the 50s and over would greatly reduce the number of cars on the roads because the majority would fail, therefore reduced incidents and more importantly near misses, end result safer roads for all.
Each demographic group has it's own share of bad/incompetent/reck
less drivers. Until we see appropriately severe sentences for those found guilty of such offences the incidence of such behavior will continue to increase.

Cosmic Crusader says...
11:49pm Mon 28 Jan 13

muscliffman wrote:
To be fair anyone driving a vehicle should not need a sign to instruct them NOT to drive a fair distance along an electrifield (or any) railway line.

"council chairman Russell Horne welcomed the scheme, but called for the inclusion of a “non-standard” sign highlighting the position of the track.

“At the moment there’s nothing to indicate that there’s a railway there,” he said."

Well apart from the railway tracks, sleepers, electric conductor rail, ballast, regular trains and a complete lack of tarmac that is. Where do these Councillors come from?

I think withdrawing this poor confused motorist's driving licence was probably the only action that was needed - did that happen though?
Tne council chairman must be blind. Take a look at the location on Google, https://maps.google.
co.uk/maps?ll=50.817
632,-1.572058&spn=0.
000003,0.002411&t=h&
z=19&layer=c&cbll=50
.817632,-1.572058&pa
noid=-1q0ZhEMFyt9oIL
0mMoBfA&cbp=12,262.0
1,,0,13.72 Nothing could be clearer.

retry69 says...
6:38am Tue 29 Jan 13

Old Harry wrote:
retry69 wrote:
Trifid wrote:
retry69 wrote:
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.
Well obviously that would come but there needs to be a starting point and starting at the 50s and over would greatly reduce the number of cars on the roads because the majority would fail, therefore reduced incidents and more importantly near misses, end result safer roads for all.
Each demographic group has it's own share of bad/incompetent/reck

less drivers. Until we see appropriately severe sentences for those found guilty of such offences the incidence of such behavior will continue to increase.
Severe sentences will not reduce incompetence and inappropriate driving behaviour, the young drivers dont care and the older ones dont realise they are in the wrong half the time

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree