A year after OAP drove onto high-speed railway line, the wait for new signs goes on (From Bournemouth Echo)
When news happens text pix and video to 80360. Start your message with BE then leave a space.
A year after OAP drove onto high-speed railway line, the wait for new signs goes on
3:58pm Monday 28th January 2013 in News By Chris Yandell
A year after OAP drove onto high-speed railway line, the wait for new signs goes on
IT was a disastrous error that could have led to tragedy.
An 85-year-old motorist was half-way across a level crossing when she suddenly veered off the road and along a high-speed railway line, narrowly missing the live rail and halting trains.
But highway chiefs have taken a year to devise a scheme aimed at preventing anything similar happening again.
Campaigners have condemned the delays surrounding the project, which includes new road signs either side of the barrier-controlled crossing at Brockenhurst station.
Denis Fryer, of the South Hampshire Rail Users’ Group, said: “It’s very poor.
“The risks attached to any incident involving an electrified rail are huge.
“The county council seems to have taken an awfully long time to address something that should have been dealt with pretty quickly.”
The incident happened a year ago today. A New Milton pensioner was giving her 20-year-old grandson a lift when she mistook the line for the entrance to the station car park.
Instead of stopping or reversing, she drove 80 yards up the track and ended up on a set of points near the end of platform two.
She and her grandson escaped unhurt after rail employees quickly switched off the power.
Network Rail said trains were in no danger because the crossing barriers were up, which meant all the signals in the area were on red.
The gran was reported for careless driving, but British Transport Police dropped the case after she handed in her licence.
The proposed new directional signs aim to prevent anyone else making the same error.
Parish council chairman Russell Horne welcomed the scheme, but called for the inclusion of a “non-standard” sign highlighting the position of the track.
“At the moment there’s nothing to indicate that there’s a railway there,” he said.
Cllr Horne defended the time taken to implement the measures.
He said: “It’s always a lot better when things are done more speedily, but the county council has had to carry out a proper process of consultation and consideration.”
A Network Rail spokesman said: “What happened at Brockenhurst was incredibly unusual. It’s not the sort of thing we see every day.”
South West Trains declined to comment.
What the county council says
Councillor Mel Kendal, deputy leader and executive member for environment and transport, said: “Immediately following the incident the county council, as the highway authority, carried out a preliminary assessment and concluded that signage was not a significant causal factor in this case.
“Because the incident took place on the railway, Network Rail undertook a detailed review and our highways engineers were happy to provide their input.
“Once the review was largely complete, our initial view was there was nothing to change our preliminary conclusion about signage but we did think it was appropriate to refresh the signing in the area. Some early proposals were prepared and have been discussed with the parish council.
“Following comments received from them, we are currently in discussion with the Department for Transport to see if we are able to accommodate a request for signs which ordinarily would not be compliant with the Department’s standards and regulations.”
Comments(15)
BIGTONE
says...
4:05pm Mon 28 Jan 13
ben111
says...
4:38pm Mon 28 Jan 13
mookie44
says...
4:40pm Mon 28 Jan 13
"THINK"
Would save on costs as well.
muscliffman
says...
5:18pm Mon 28 Jan 13
"council chairman Russell Horne welcomed the scheme, but called for the inclusion of a “non-standard” sign highlighting the position of the track.
“At the moment there’s nothing to indicate that there’s a railway there,” he said."
Well apart from the railway tracks, sleepers, electric conductor rail, ballast, regular trains and a complete lack of tarmac that is. Where do these Councillors come from?
I think withdrawing this poor confused motorist's driving licence was probably the only action that was needed - did that happen though?
PokesdownMark
says...
5:43pm Mon 28 Jan 13
nobbjockie
says...
6:36pm Mon 28 Jan 13
retry69
says...
6:52pm Mon 28 Jan 13
nobbjockie
says...
7:08pm Mon 28 Jan 13
nobbjockie wrote:Can you imagine what could have happened if there had been a Nissan Micra coming up from Christchurch!
I'm not be funny but WTF!!!
Trifid
says...
7:59pm Mon 28 Jan 13
retry69 wrote:More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
PokesdownMark
says...
8:05pm Mon 28 Jan 13
retry69
says...
9:40pm Mon 28 Jan 13
Trifid wrote:Well obviously that would come but there needs to be a starting point and starting at the 50s and over would greatly reduce the number of cars on the roads because the majority would fail, therefore reduced incidents and more importantly near misses, end result safer roads for all.
retry69 wrote:More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
Old Harry
says...
11:44pm Mon 28 Jan 13
retry69 wrote:Each demographic group has it's own share of bad/incompetent/reck
Trifid wrote:Well obviously that would come but there needs to be a starting point and starting at the 50s and over would greatly reduce the number of cars on the roads because the majority would fail, therefore reduced incidents and more importantly near misses, end result safer roads for all.
retry69 wrote:More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
less drivers. Until we see appropriately severe sentences for those found guilty of such offences the incidence of such behavior will continue to increase.
Cosmic Crusader
says...
11:49pm Mon 28 Jan 13
muscliffman wrote:Tne council chairman must be blind. Take a look at the location on Google, https://maps.google.
To be fair anyone driving a vehicle should not need a sign to instruct them NOT to drive a fair distance along an electrifield (or any) railway line.
"council chairman Russell Horne welcomed the scheme, but called for the inclusion of a “non-standard” sign highlighting the position of the track.
“At the moment there’s nothing to indicate that there’s a railway there,” he said."
Well apart from the railway tracks, sleepers, electric conductor rail, ballast, regular trains and a complete lack of tarmac that is. Where do these Councillors come from?
I think withdrawing this poor confused motorist's driving licence was probably the only action that was needed - did that happen though?
co.uk/maps?ll=50.817
632,-1.572058&spn=0.
000003,0.002411&t=h&
z=19&layer=c&cbll=50
.817632,-1.572058&pa
noid=-1q0ZhEMFyt9oIL
0mMoBfA&cbp=12,262.0
1,,0,13.72 Nothing could be clearer.
retry69
says...
6:38am Tue 29 Jan 13
Old Harry wrote:Severe sentences will not reduce incompetence and inappropriate driving behaviour, the young drivers dont care and the older ones dont realise they are in the wrong half the time
retry69 wrote:Each demographic group has it's own share of bad/incompetent/reck
Trifid wrote:Well obviously that would come but there needs to be a starting point and starting at the 50s and over would greatly reduce the number of cars on the roads because the majority would fail, therefore reduced incidents and more importantly near misses, end result safer roads for all.
retry69 wrote:More than willing, if same goes for under 50s. Not sorry.
Urgent need for re-tests and awareness assessments for over 50s SORRY!!!
less drivers. Until we see appropriately severe sentences for those found guilty of such offences the incidence of such behavior will continue to increase.
P Barker says...
4:02pm Mon 28 Jan 13