Christchurch council members consider involvement in City Deal bid

FEARS about closer working with Bournemouth council were voiced as Christchurch members considered their prospective involvement in the City Deal bid.

The possibility of the future union with the neighbouring unitary authority was discussed at a meeting of Christchurch’s resources committee, with some councillors citing the history between the two authorities as a reason to exercise caution.

The government has invited Bournemouth to make a bid for City Deal status, which is intended to benefit not just the main town but the wider area.

And in order to make the bid conurbation-based, the council has invited Poole, Christchurch and East Dorset to take part in discussions and support the bid.

Ideas under discussion include the creation of an Enterprise Zone for Bournemouth Airport and Poole Port and the pooling of transport funding to invest in key infrastructure, which could include roads around the airport.

But despite the potential economic benefits to the area, some Christchurch members had reservations.

Cllr Colin Bungey said: “What I want to know is how tightly does this tie us into Bournemouth?

“I have reservations about the prosperity of Bournemouth and some of the disasters that have happened in their borough.

“The reef and Imax and the money that has been spent – I would not like this borough to get tied into a situation where we lose our sovereignty if we became too close to Bournemouth.

“This council fought a successful battle with great help from the residents to stay independent a few years ago when Bournemouth were awarded unitary status.

“I am happy to go forward for a deal that will encourage growth and prospects in the borough but with caution.”

Cllr John Lofts also asked whether the airport could be in its own enterprise zone separate from Poole port to ensure the council’s aim and objectives for the airport were protected.

Dave Barnes, strategic director at the council partnership, said: “This does not tie us into anything politically or financially.

“They are not really interested in Christchurch in terms of any takeover.

“We are being treated as an equal partner in this. They respect what we can bring to the table.”

Councillors voted to delegate authority to the leader of the council to negotiate the authority’s further involvement.

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

2:12pm Tue 15 Jan 13

twynham says...

"Councillors voted to delegate authority to the leader of the council to negotiate the authority’s further involvement. "
.
That's OK then!!!
"Councillors voted to delegate authority to the leader of the council to negotiate the authority’s further involvement. " . That's OK then!!! twynham

5:45pm Tue 15 Jan 13

skydriver says...

If it improves the quality of local councillors then I'm all for it,
If it improves the quality of local councillors then I'm all for it, skydriver

7:16am Wed 16 Jan 13

Loyal2AFCB says...

Bungey is in no position to criticise Bournemouth. I can think of numerous planning crimes commited by Christchurch councillors over the years!
Bungey is in no position to criticise Bournemouth. I can think of numerous planning crimes commited by Christchurch councillors over the years! Loyal2AFCB

8:41am Wed 16 Jan 13

jobsworthwatch says...

The sole objective of such a merger should be to reduce the council tax burden on residents by reducing the jobsworth head count. Trouble is all councils are basically self preservation societies!
The sole objective of such a merger should be to reduce the council tax burden on residents by reducing the jobsworth head count. Trouble is all councils are basically self preservation societies! jobsworthwatch

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree