Report this comment
  • "£50K a year income is more than enough for a household with several healthy, able bodied kids. If it's not enough, then frankly they're either piddling money up the wall on frivolous stuff pretending to be posh, or they've bred beyond their means, in which case they should have tied a knot in it. On the other hand, capping benefit based on earnings or the level of benefits received where a severely disabled or handicapped family member or members is/are concerned is a very dangerous idea as you would have to assess each case individually. Care is a very expensive commodity. Forcing family members who are carers back to work actually costs the taxpayer in the long term, because they then need carers to look after the kids instead of doing it themselves, and that costs more to the state than carer's allowances!"
  • This field is mandatory
  • This field is mandatory
  • Please note we will not accept reports with HTML tags or URLs in them.


  • Enter the above word in the box below

HAVE YOUR SAY: Will you be affected by child benefit changes?

First published in News

The coalition Government came under a sustained attack today for a raft of welfare reforms that critics claim are punishing the poor and hitting women hardest.

A senior child protection figure warned that record numbers of children would be taken away from their families as the impact of public-sector cuts and benefits changes hammered home.

Anthony Douglas, chief executive of Cafcass, the organisation that represents children in care cases, told the Independent he feared the number of cases could rise by up to 8%.

He added: ''Given what we know about the association between poverty deprivation and care, the increase in economic difficulties can take away the margins of support for people who are just managing to keep things together.

''Often quite small amounts of support can make all the difference. So I think that there is a risk of underestimating the way in which this support can keep some families going.''

Meanwhile, Labour claimed cuts to child benefit that came into effect at midnight, combined with a three-year benefits and tax credits squeeze, was a ''huge assault'' on millions of working families.

Research compiled by the Commons library for the shadow equalities minister Yvette Cooper shows 4.6 million women who receive child tax credit directly will be hit by a cap on welfare increases, according to the Guardian.

It comes as the Child Poverty Action Group published a report claiming changes to the way government is uprating benefits is a ''poverty-producing'' move that further hit the poorest.

The charity warns that while pensioners have been given a triple lock guarantee of a notable rise, the worst off will face a ''double lockout'' that ''cuts them loose from the cost of living and the mainstream of society''.

Chancellor George Osborne announced last year annual rises in most working-age benefits are to be capped at 1%, cutting a further £3.7 billion from the welfare bill, but insisted he would protect the vulnerable by continuing to increase carer benefits and disability benefits in line with inflation.

The charity warns levelling the cap over each of the next three years would amount to a 4% real terms cut in benefits on top of £18bn of already announced cuts.

It found welfare spending on workless families has been falling and warned under the changes absolute and relative child poverty will increase.

CPAG chief executive Alison Garnham said: ''It's wrong to punish the poorest and most disadvantaged in our society by cutting social security protection every time growth targets are missed while the better-off are protected.

''It really would be politics of the worst kind if, as reported, this bill has been laid to create a political dividing line - we are talking about real lives, not political games.

''Depicting the neighbour with drawn curtains in the morning as a 'scrounger' to be scorned is a dangerous game to play. You may find it is a sick or disabled person, whose curtains are only drawn when their carer arrives, or a nurse who just got to bed after her night shift.

''This is a poverty-producing bill that does nothing to reduce the need for support.''

Prime Minister David Cameron yesterday defended cuts to child benefit payments, which will see families with one earner on more than £50,000 lose some or all of the payment while households with two parents with salaries just under the trigger keep theirs, insisting the move was ''fundamentally fair''.

Will you be affected by the changes? Let us know in the comments.  Please note our new guidelines for commenters here.

Comments (18)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree