Sentence ‘is no deterrent to other cowboy builders out there’

UPSET: Edward and Barbara Longcroft, with their dog Harvey UPSET: Edward and Barbara Longcroft, with their dog Harvey

IN a separate case against Kevin Sherwood, Bournemouth Magistrates Court heard how he flouted building regulations while working at the home of an elderly couple at Bear Cross.

Sherwood pleaded guilty to four charges brought by Bournemouth trading standards, including failing to inform Edward and Barbara Longcroft of their right to cancel the work he started in September 2011.

The couple, aged 89 and 81, originally contracted Sherwood’s firm Kinson Roofing to have repairs done, but were told the roof would need to be replaced.

Over the next few weeks he charged them £25,500 for the work, money they had put aside in case one of them needed to go into care.

“We felt we had to have the work done as soon as possible as the winter was drawing in,” said Mrs Longcroft.

“One of us will probably have to go into care and the money we spent should have been used for that.

“We are not broke but I have had to cut back on housekeeping, and it is not easy these days.”

Sherwood was sentenced to 14 days imprisonment to run alongside his current 12-month sentence for fraud.

Mr Longcroft said they didn’t feel the sentence was adequate.

“We get no compensation for what he has done to us, and this is no deterrent to other cowboy builders out there,” he added.

Comments(5)

pete woodley says...
9:15am Fri 4 Jan 13

Pathetic sentencing again,should have been a lot more,waste of police time.

elite50 says...
9:30am Fri 4 Jan 13

He ripped them off for 25 Thou. and gets 14 days????
Wow, where can you get a job that pays 1,800 Quid a day for porridge?
Answer: B'm'th Magistrates Court!
I notice that they dont print the magistrates name.
HE/SHE should be the one in prison!

speedy231278 says...
11:22am Fri 4 Jan 13

In effect, he got no punishment at all. Doesn't having these 14 days running alongside the year's conviction just mean it disappears into the previous sentence? Surely the punishment has to be added consecutively, or it's not worth anything?

Cosmic Crusader says...
11:35am Fri 4 Jan 13

These sentences are totally inadequate. He will be out in a few months time and I dread to think just how much it will be costing the tax payer. Forget the prison, he should have been given a compulsory work order for a year repairing, under supervision, council properties.

Don@TAS22 says...
12:58pm Fri 4 Jan 13

See my comments on the other article relating to this builder. Get together and employ a solicitor jointly to sue him. That will hit him where it hurts - something the courts seem incapable of doing.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree