Sonia McColl to deliver petition to Number 10 calling for government to reduce commission on sale of park homes

PETITION: Sonia McColl with the original petition

PETITION: Sonia McColl with the original petition

First published in News by

THE Wareham woman whose campaign laid the foundations for new laws to safeguard park home owners’ rights is set to march on Downing Street again.

Sonia McColl, will be joined by supporters including Mid Dorset and North Poole Lib Dem MP Annette Brooke, to deliver a new petition to Number 10 in July.

This 30,000-signature document is calling for government to reduce the 10 per cent commission on the sale of park homes, currently payable to site owners.

Mrs McColl, founder of the Park Home Owners Justice Campaign, started her fight four years ago in a bid to close a contentious legal loophole that had been allowing rogue park home site operators to snap up residents’ homes at a fraction of their true value.

Her campaign paved the way for the new Mobile Homes Bill 2013, that removed park owners from the ‘approval of the buyer’ stage – effectively barring them from being able to influence the selling process.

Speaking in Parliament, Mrs Brooke welcomed the new act as “going a long way towards rebalancing the rights of park home owners and site owners”.

However, she said the commission percentage question had to be addressed. “We have achieved a lot in ending the injustices that were being suffered,” said Mrs Brooke.

“But we cannot be complacent until all park home owners are treated fairly.”

The MP accepted the need for site operators to charge fees, in order for them to run viable businesses and cover site maintenance costs. But she highlighted the plight of elderly park home residents who may need to move into nursing homes or other residential care but, as a result of the crippling 10 per cent commission fees, are struggling to meet these costs.

Mrs Brooke said: “We need transparency on what various payments are being used for, and we need to ensure that there is no further exploitation of park home owners.”

Comments (3)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

5:07pm Sat 17 May 14

ashleycross says...

When a new owner comes onto the site the cost of training them to fit in by abiding by the rules of the site is very high. They are often older people who can be very cantankerous. This expense should be at least partly met by the commission charged. If not, then no one will make sure people know what is expected of them and the places will deteriorate into slums as in the united states.
When a new owner comes onto the site the cost of training them to fit in by abiding by the rules of the site is very high. They are often older people who can be very cantankerous. This expense should be at least partly met by the commission charged. If not, then no one will make sure people know what is expected of them and the places will deteriorate into slums as in the united states. ashleycross
  • Score: 0

6:38pm Sat 17 May 14

Yankee1 says...

ashleycross wrote:
When a new owner comes onto the site the cost of training them to fit in by abiding by the rules of the site is very high. They are often older people who can be very cantankerous. This expense should be at least partly met by the commission charged. If not, then no one will make sure people know what is expected of them and the places will deteriorate into slums as in the united states.
Sorry. 'Slums in the United States'. Do, please, explain your knowledge of these, or recant.
[quote][p][bold]ashleycross[/bold] wrote: When a new owner comes onto the site the cost of training them to fit in by abiding by the rules of the site is very high. They are often older people who can be very cantankerous. This expense should be at least partly met by the commission charged. If not, then no one will make sure people know what is expected of them and the places will deteriorate into slums as in the united states.[/p][/quote]Sorry. 'Slums in the United States'. Do, please, explain your knowledge of these, or recant. Yankee1
  • Score: -1

6:38pm Sat 17 May 14

Yankee1 says...

ashleycross wrote:
When a new owner comes onto the site the cost of training them to fit in by abiding by the rules of the site is very high. They are often older people who can be very cantankerous. This expense should be at least partly met by the commission charged. If not, then no one will make sure people know what is expected of them and the places will deteriorate into slums as in the united states.
Sorry. 'Slums in the United States'. Do, please, explain your knowledge of these, or recant.
[quote][p][bold]ashleycross[/bold] wrote: When a new owner comes onto the site the cost of training them to fit in by abiding by the rules of the site is very high. They are often older people who can be very cantankerous. This expense should be at least partly met by the commission charged. If not, then no one will make sure people know what is expected of them and the places will deteriorate into slums as in the united states.[/p][/quote]Sorry. 'Slums in the United States'. Do, please, explain your knowledge of these, or recant. Yankee1
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

Send us your news, pictures and videos

Most read stories

Local Info

Enter your postcode, town or place name

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree